<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts (aka moan) about Buzzword</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danny-t.co.uk/index.php/2010/04/22/thoughts-aka-moan-about-buzzword/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danny-t.co.uk/index.php/2010/04/22/thoughts-aka-moan-about-buzzword/</link>
	<description>Web apps fanatic, ramblings on dev for web, mobile and other geeky stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:06:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyT</title>
		<link>http://danny-t.co.uk/index.php/2010/04/22/thoughts-aka-moan-about-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-102159</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danny-t.co.uk/?p=193#comment-102159</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bob, I do quite a bit of jumping between flash player versions so good to know that&#039;s the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bob, I do quite a bit of jumping between flash player versions so good to know that&#8217;s the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Treitman</title>
		<link>http://danny-t.co.uk/index.php/2010/04/22/thoughts-aka-moan-about-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-102125</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Treitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danny-t.co.uk/?p=193#comment-102125</guid>
		<description>The issue with Mac/Chrome is not that it wasn&#039;t fully tested. Rather, the testing demonstrated that there were a number of problems with the beta releases of Flash player 10.1 that could not resolved. As soon as they are, we&#039;ll remove this restriction. In the meantime, you can revert to Player 10.0 if you want to use acrobat.com on Mac/Chrome. (I suspect that your earlier experience of successfully using Acrobat.com on Mac/Chrome was prior to your upgrading to Flash Player 10.1.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with Mac/Chrome is not that it wasn&#8217;t fully tested. Rather, the testing demonstrated that there were a number of problems with the beta releases of Flash player 10.1 that could not resolved. As soon as they are, we&#8217;ll remove this restriction. In the meantime, you can revert to Player 10.0 if you want to use acrobat.com on Mac/Chrome. (I suspect that your earlier experience of successfully using Acrobat.com on Mac/Chrome was prior to your upgrading to Flash Player 10.1.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djam</title>
		<link>http://danny-t.co.uk/index.php/2010/04/22/thoughts-aka-moan-about-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-102119</link>
		<dc:creator>Djam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danny-t.co.uk/?p=193#comment-102119</guid>
		<description>I am surprised with the &quot;chrome on mac&quot; issue, isn&#039;t Buzzword is running in Flash player (which should make it browser agnostic)? 

Agree on the &quot;second class citizen&quot;, it is not promoted enough and I think doesn&#039;t get deserved size of audience (which, in turn, slows development).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised with the &#8220;chrome on mac&#8221; issue, isn&#8217;t Buzzword is running in Flash player (which should make it browser agnostic)? </p>
<p>Agree on the &#8220;second class citizen&#8221;, it is not promoted enough and I think doesn&#8217;t get deserved size of audience (which, in turn, slows development).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

